When someone joins an organisation, they bring far more than a CV and a set of professional skills. They arrive carrying a mixture of nerves, expectations, hopes for a new chapter, and a quiet but powerful question that they rarely say out loud: did I make the right choice? The answer to that question begins to form long before they log in for the first time on their opening morning.
A contract that is issued promptly, clear information about when and where to start, equipment that is ready for use, and a sense that someone has taken time to prepare for their arrival all contribute to an early impression of competence, care, and reassurance. These are the small but significant signals that tell a new starter that they are entering an organisation that values people, understands the importance of first impressions, and is genuinely ready to welcome them.
Unfortunately, the opposite is equally true. When contracts are delayed, equipment is still “being sorted”, or a new starter begins their first morning with an empty calendar and no warm introduction, they receive a much different message. Even if no one intends it, silence and disorganisation can be interpreted as indifference. It creates uncertainty at exactly the moment when confidence should be building.
Many organisations continue to view onboarding as little more than a checklist or a practical sequence of tasks: completing forms, reviewing policies, attending mandatory training, gaining system access, and sitting through a tour of processes. While all of these elements have their place, they do not create a sense of belonging. Onboarding, in reality, is emotional long before it is administrative. It is the point at which culture becomes tangible and lived; the moment when someone begins to understand not only what the organisation does, but how it behaves, what it prioritises, and whether it is the kind of environment in which they can do their best work.
When onboarding goes well, people settle quickly, gain confidence early, and begin contributing meaningfully in a shorter period of time. Managers benefit from reduced hand-holding because new starters have clarity, direction, and a structured foundation to build upon. Colleagues notice the difference too, as they feel less pressure to fill the gaps that arise when someone is left to figure things out alone.
When onboarding goes wrong, the consequences are far more costly than a slow first week. Poor onboarding has a direct impact on retention, performance, morale, and organisational reputation. A new hire who feels uncertain or undervalued during their first few weeks is significantly more likely to keep one eye on the job market, particularly in the current climate where many applicants apply for multiple roles simultaneously. Even in a competitive market with large volumes of candidates, individuals are increasingly selective. They may accept an offer, but they will stay only if the experience matches the promise.
The financial cost of poor onboarding is substantial. Recruitment fees, advertising spend, time invested in interviews, internal planning, IT setup, and the inevitable disruption to team capacity all add up quickly. If a new employee leaves within the first three to six months, much of that investment is lost entirely, and the organisation finds itself back at the beginning of the hiring cycle. Studies vary, but many estimate the cost of replacing an employee to be between 30% and 200% of their annual salary, depending on the role. When multiplied across a business, the financial and operational impact becomes impossible to ignore.
The good news is that most onboarding challenges are avoidable. With thoughtful planning and consistent execution, organisations can transform the experience for new starters without creating unnecessary bureaucracy. Small, intentional changes often make the biggest difference. Issuing contracts promptly, providing a clear plan for the first day and week, ensuring equipment is set up before arrival, allocating a buddy for support, and scheduling introductory conversations with key colleagues can turn an uncertain beginning into a confident, well-supported start.
Clarity is one of the greatest gifts an organisation can give a new employee. A structured 30–60–90 day plan, outlining expected milestones, priorities, and learning goals, helps people understand how to contribute effectively and what good performance will look like in their early months. It also supports managers by providing a shared framework that reduces the likelihood of missed conversations or inconsistent expectations.
Remote and hybrid onboarding requires particular care. Without the natural interactions that occur in an office, new starters can quickly feel isolated or disconnected. Regular check-ins, intentional introductions, clearer communication about working patterns, and an explicit explanation of “how we work here” can make the difference between someone thriving or feeling adrift. The absence of informal learning opportunities means that remote onboarding must be more structured, not less.
Just as important is the practice of gathering feedback. A simple review at 30, 60, and 90 days can reveal patterns, highlight gaps in the process, and identify opportunities to improve the experience for future hires. Onboarding should never be static; it should evolve as the organisation grows, adapts, and learns.
Ultimately, onboarding is the first real demonstration of organisational culture. It signals what matters, how people are treated, and the level of care that underpins the employee experience. When done well, it turns a job into a journey and creates a lasting sense of belonging. When done poorly, it plants seeds of doubt that may linger long after a new starter’s first day.
In a world where talent is more mobile, expectations are higher, and candidates have more choice than ever, onboarding is no longer just a process. It is one of the clearest expressions of who you are as an organisation — and one of the strongest indicators of whether people will want to stay.
Tick the forms, show the systems, hand out the policies. But really, on-boarding is a feeling. It’s the moment culture becomes real. It’s how quickly someone moves from “new hire” to “part of us.”
That’s why it matters to get the small things right:
- Have the contract signed before they arrive.
- Map out a Day 1 and Week 1 plan.
- Make sure someone greets them, in person or on screen.
- Connect them with people, not just processes.
Because belonging isn’t built in an induction pack. It’s built in those early signals of care and clarity.
Done well, on-boarding turns a job into a journey. Done badly, it leaves someone wondering if they should have kept looking. It is also a feeling that can stay with them long after their start date.
At Claireity, we help organisations put people at the heart of their processes — from the first contract to the first day and beyond.
If you’d like to explore how on-boarding could feel clearer and more human in your organisation, get in touch:
Claireity 
Leave a comment